What cowards do while hiding behind phony user names.
Freedom of Speech!
By Casey James
Investigative Reporter
Redding, California The owner of the domain Rocks4me.com and the Real James C. Garland.
Post Comment
What is the point in having freedom of speech, when it can be taken away? When a businesswoman has more power and influence over the comment section in a local newspaper, than the editor does.
Because the businessperson in the community buys ad space from the very same newspaper that has a comment section where comments are made about news stories written by the newspapers reporters. Money does talk as they say and is the root to all-evil.
When a businessperson is allowed to stalk, harass and intimidate another poster over an opinion and a point of view of the right to a fair trail. The businesswoman having multiple user names with no other purpose in mind, but MALICIOUS intentions to try and defame and post information about another poster, out of hate, as if the poster is the one that committed the crime of killing an innocent homeless man.
“The Internet offers new opportunities for stalking, hence the term cyber stalking. The cyber stalker can, from the safety of his or her home, or the anonymity of an office environment, trace, track and find out personal details of the target, including details of the target's family.”
If anyone wanted to find out anything about the personal life of this poster, all they would have had to do is a web search. Instead the posters personal information was searched and posted falsely, and misrepresented by the use of multiple user names to try and intimidate the poster. The same way a thug, animal or gang member would use to try and harass their victims. The poster was their target to try and control his opinions and point of view, through their intimidation of the poster, (the same way cyber bullies do to their victims or prey when they do not like what they say or do.)
Where the poster was accused of “Guilt by Association”, and falsely accused by this businesswoman and her gang of ruthless supporters, for standing up for these teens to have a right to get a fair trail, not one by vigilantes or vigilante justice.
The poster did not know the homeless man Tim Alcorn, nor did he know the three teens Albert Curtis Sanchez, Jared Cory Voss or John Hadley Thompson who are being accused of this crime.
The poster stated he did not condone what they did. This is the Untied States of America where people are given the chance to prove their innocence by due process of the laws and judged by a jury of their peers when tried as adults.
We are a civilized country, not a country that approves of or condones vigilante justice. The poster was sadden and sickened by the senseless act and killing of Tim Alcorn and the loss felt by his family and friends as any one else; but the poster feels we are all entitled to our day in court, “guilty” or “innocent” in this Country. Cases are not tried according to pubic pressure or community demand. They are tried according to the rule law. We may not like those laws or how they are applied.
No one has the right to stalk, harass and intimidate another person over his or her opinion or point of view. A private citizen's reputation and privacy interests tend to outweigh free speech considerations and deserve greater protection from the courts and a newspaper is responsible for up holding those same rights.
Most states provide for a demand for a printed retraction of defamation and only allow a lawsuit if there is no such admission of error.
From the very first post he made standing up for the rule of law against vigilante justice, his name and reputation has been drug through the mud and to the cleaners by these thugs, animals and vigilantes who claim they are proud law abiding citizens in Redding.
If anything they have shown they are just the opposite and guilty as charged as being cyber stalkers as Internet bullies stalking, harassing, and trying to intimidate another poster over an opinion and point of view in the comment section on a local newspaper.
While standing up and defending his self against stalking, harassment, and intimidation his comments were removed and theirs were allowed to stay and left intact after requesting that they be removed, instead he was denied his freedom of speech from making any further comments by being banned over others defaming him.
There is something definitely wrong with this picture where the person being stalked, harassed and intimated against is the one that is banned and the stalkers are allowed to stay and continue to stalk, harass and intimidate others the way they have done to this poster over an opinion and point of view.
How many more posters are they going to be allowed to stalk, harass and intimidate when they do not agree with their opinions and point of view? How many user names are they going to be allowed to have under the same ISP address with no other purpose but MALICIOUS intentions against posters?
A business owner Redding can be proud to know is a cyber stalker and an Internet bully who owns a business that does not accept food stamps and has a night auditor for the second shift? She also has a brother that has ADHD and talks about him on line without his permission too. She also has a daughter that is a senior at Enterprise High School who is a member of one of the sports teams. And her daughter’s best friend’s name is Amber, the sister to a 14-year-old brother Frankie was hit by a car and is still in the hospital in the Bay Area. A car also hit his best friend James on Halloween night.
It has been suggested that if this poster does not like what happened they can start their own newspaper. They have also been told that the constitution does not guarantee freedom of speech on a newspaper comment section on line. They have been told they know nothing about constitutional law.
They have been called every name in the book because of their opinion and point of view for standing up for the very Constitution that others say they do not have a right to do. They do not have the right to speak out about the rights of the accused for fear by those that the accused will not get what they have coming to them. Regardless what the law says on how they will be prosecuted and given their day in court to face the consequences of their actions as to their guilt or innocence.
Why bother with having laws, if they are going to be ignored by the majority that feel they have the right to say how they want the sentences carried out before the accused even step foot in a court of law and are given their day in court. When they make statements to the effect they hope they will get called for jury duty so they can make sure they are all found guilty without first even hearing the evidence that will be presented by the prosecution?
These are the same type of people who have no problem taking a posters personal information that they find on the Internet and twisting the facts to suit their way of thinking; because they are perfect and have never made an error or mistake in their life. Instead of letting other posters search for that information on their own, they take it upon themselves to do it, because they are so righteous and no body is as perfect, as they are in life.
What they do not realize in the little world they live in, they do not have that right (even though they think they do) to stalk, harass, and intimidate others who they feel do not agree with their opinion on how the world works in their mind. Stalking, Harassing and Intimidation is against the law.
If they did to a person what they have done on line, they could be charged with breaking the law by the very law abiding person, who sees no problem with breaking the law behind multiple user names. Yet, this person sees nothing wrong with their actions, as they feel it is within in their right to stalk, harass and intimidate anyone they feel disagrees with their opinion and point of view. Because they are above the law and it is everyone else who are the criminals that break the law, not them, they are perfect and would never do anything that would be considered against the law. After all, they are the judge, jury and executer of every one, but themselves, as the cowards they are, hiding behind anonymous multiple user names.
They would not dare let anyone know who they really are as others might think differently of them if they knew who they really were in real life, and if they knew that they stalked, harassed and intimidated people on line. While giving the impression they are perfect without any flaws or imperfections as that would give others reason to believe they are not as perfect or law abiding as they have led others to believe they are in real life.